Back

Comparing 3-D visual and 2-D tactile encounter rates in benthic and pelagic habitats

Forbes, E. J.; Stockwell, J. D.

2026-04-24 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.24.720635 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Encounter rate models are important tools for evaluating and estimating trophic interactions between species. While encounter rate parameters have been measured for many freshwater pelagic fishes, most benthic fishes remain mostly unstudied. Those few efforts to generate encounter rate models for benthic fishes often hold mathematical assumptions based on visual foraging, despite the many cases in which benthic fishes employ the lateral line to forage. Furthermore, encounter rate models are rarely compared, despite the many cases in which prey animals face predation risk from multiple types of predators. For example, the macroinvertebrate Mysis is exposed to both benthic and pelagic predation risk during diel vertical migration (DVM). Comparing the risks between habitats could help evaluate predation risk as an ultimate cause of their DVM behavior. We created a novel encounter rate model based on lateral line ("tactile") foraging by sculpins (Cottidae) given the saltatory (stop-and-go) nature of their movement. The tactile model demonstrated variation in behavior and peak encounter rate with detection distance, movement velocity, and rest durations. We then directly compared predation risk for Mysis by parameterizing both our tactile benthic (2D) encounter rate model for sculpin and a visual pelagic (3D) for rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax). Tactile encounter rates were generally lower than visual rates for individual predators. However, population level encounter rates at night were greater in the benthic habitat than the pelagic habitat. Overall, our model estimates of encounter rates were consistent with the long-standing hypothesis that predation is an ultimate driver of DVM behavior.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.2%
3
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.7%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
7
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.8%
9
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
13
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
14
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
15
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
17
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
28
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%