Back

Evolutionary origins and chromatin state shape X-chromosome upregulation pattern during eutherian and metatherian embryogenesis

Naik, H. C.; Narendran, P.; GAYEN, S.

2026-04-28 genetics
10.64898/2026.04.24.720575 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In mammals, silent state of one of the X-chromosomes in female balance the X-dosage between sexes. In parallel, X to autosome imbalance due to monoallelic expression of X-linked genes relative to biallelic autosomal genes, is primarily compensated through the X-chromosome upregulation (XCU). It has been demonstrated that X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) and XCU coincides during embryogenesis, however, XCU is not global and it occurs in a gene-specific manner. The underlying mechanistic aspects of such specificity of XCU remain unknown. Here, we provide systematic and comparative analysis across eutherians (mouse, human and pig) and metatherian (opossum) embryogenesis to determine if evolutionary origins shape the XCU. Intriguingly, we show that while evolutionary older X-linked genes (predating mammalian divergence) undergo robust XCU consistently across developmental stages, younger mammalianLJorigin genes do not. Similarly, the eutherian X-linked genes conserved in metatherian X (X-ortholog) undergo robust XCU, whereas genes orthologus to metatherian autosome (Auto-ortholog) exhibit weaker pattern of XCU. Further, strata-wise comparison revealed that genes in older XLJchromosome strata (1-2) consistently undergo upregulation, whereas strata 3-4 genes do not. Importantly, we show that different evolutionary classes of X-linked genes, which undergo robust XCU, are often enriched with active chromatin marks (H3K36me3, H3K27ac and H3K4me1) relative to the autosome, suggesting that chromatin state mediate the XCU. Moreover, we show that often active-marks enrichment correlates with differential XCU dynamics of different class of genes. Taken together, our study provides significant insight into the evolutionary dynamics of XCU and underlying mechanistic framework.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
12.2%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.0%
3
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.3%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.5%
5
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
8
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
9
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
14
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
17
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
19
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
22
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
23
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
24
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
26
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
29
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
30
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%