Back

Severe Periodontitis Biomarker Identification by Deep Salivary Proteome Profiling with Astral DIA Mass Spectrometry

Yu, X.; Yan, R.; Li, H.; Xie, Y.; Bi, M.; Li, Y.; Roccuzzo, A.; Tonetti, M. S.

2026-04-25 dentistry and oral medicine
10.64898/2026.04.24.26351658 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimTo comprehensively characterize the salivary proteome in periodontitis using Orbitrap Astral data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS), identify an atlas of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), and develop a machine learning-derived multi-protein biomarker panel for non-invasive diagnosis of stage III/IV periodontitis. Materials and MethodsUnstimulated saliva samples from 199 participants (periodontal health/gingivitis, n=120; stage III/IV periodontitis, n=79) were analyzed by Orbitrap Astral DIA-MS. DEPs were identified, and pathway enrichment analysis was performed. A two-tier machine learning pipeline--integrating pathway-based feature selection with cross-validated evaluation--was applied to identify the optimal diagnostic panel. ResultsOrbitrap Astral DIA-MS quantified 5,597 salivary proteins and 1,966 DEPs (|log2FC|>0.5, FDR<0.05). Pathway analysis identified 14 periodontitis-relevant KEGG pathways, including Th17 cell differentiation, IL-17 signaling, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, and complement and coagulation cascades. A four-protein panel (TEC, RAC1, MAPK14, KRT17) achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.985 {+/-} 0.010, with 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The panel was corroborated using public datasets. ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this study represents the first application of Orbitrap Astral DIA mass spectrometry in periodontitis research, establishing a disease-specific DEPs atlas and a salivary biomarker panel with high diagnostic accuracy for stage III/IV periodontitis, providing a foundation for future external validation studies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.