Back

BETA: Resting-state fMRI Biotypes for tDCS Efficacy in Anxiety Among Older Adults At Risk For Alzheimer's Disease

Stolte, S. E.; Cheng, J.; Acharya, C.; Gu, L.; O'Shea, A.; Indahlastari, A.; Woods, A. J.; Fang, R.

2026-04-27 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.24.26351493 medRxiv
Show abstract

Anxiety is usually gauged by self-report, yet a single symptom level can reflect disparate neural circuitry. In Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRD) this heterogeneity becomes a barrier to effective neuromodulation: some patients may benefit from transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), while others may not. To overcome this obstacle, we introduced BETA (Biotypes for tDCS Efficacy in Anxiety), a data-driven pipeline that uses resting-state fMRI functional connectivity to derive anxiety subtypes that are intrinsically linked to tDCS response. A transformer-based variational autoencoder compresses high-dimensional connectivity into a 50-dimensional latent embedding that emphasizes networks implicated in cognitive aging and anxiety. A deep-embedded clustering loss, regularized by a clinically informed term that pulls together individuals who exhibit similar post-tDCS anxiety change, yields four distinct subtypes. Across all subtypes, disrupted coupling between sensory-processing and higher-order cognitive regions emerges as a common hallmark. Crucially, one cluster is resistant to frontal-lobe tDCS, whereas two clusters demonstrate significant anxiety reduction following stimulation. The responsive subtypes are defined by strengthened connectivity between the lateral occipital cortex-superior division (sLOC) and medial frontal cortex (MedFC), and between sLOC and the intracalcarine cortex (ICC). BETA demonstrates that fMRI-based subtyping can directly identify which patients are likely to benefit from tDCS, providing a concrete roadmap for precision psychiatry in ADRD and facilitating tailored therapeutic strategies for anxiety.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.