Back

Body Composition and Body Image in Collegiate Athletes: The Mediating Role of Trait Sport Confidence

Hao, F.; Williams, M.; Liu, C.; Liu, S.

2026-05-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.24.26351348 medRxiv
Show abstract

Athletes bodies are both performance agents and targets of evaluative scrutiny, yet little is known about the psychological processes linking body composition to body image among athletes. In this pre-registered study, we examined whether competence-related self-evaluations mediate or moderate associations between adiposity and body image in 327 Chinese collegiate athletes (78.6% male). Drawing on Self-Objectification Theory and the Sport Confidence Model, we tested two competing hypotheses, including a filter (parallel mediation) and a buffer (moderation) account. Factor analysis results of four body image scales supported a two-factor structure, comprising a proactive, functionality-oriented positive dimension and a reactive, appearance-distress-driven negative dimension. Hierarchical regressions showed that fat mass index (FMI) was associated with lower positive and higher negative body image (ps < 0.05). Importantly, parallel mediation analysis results indicated that trait sport confidence mediated between FMI and both body image dimensions, with a stronger effect for positive body image ({beta} = -0.04, 95% CI [-0.09, -0.01]) than for negative body image ({beta} = 0.03, 95% CI [0.01, 0.07]). Subjective sport performance was not evidenced as a mediator. No moderation effects were supported. These findings suggest that the body composition-body image link in athletes is interpretive: enduring competence beliefs may matter more than proximal performance appraisals in affecting how athletes make sense of their bodies. Positive body image appears especially dependent on competence-grounded meaning-making, whereas negative body image remains more directly tied to appearance-based evaluative cues. Collegiate sport environments may benefit from prioritizing functionality-centered feedback over physique-focused evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
34.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.9%
3
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.8%
11
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
13
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
26
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%