Back

Comparison scanning generalized eigendecomposition separates temporal dynamics of alpha oscillations during inhibition of spatialized acoustic distractors.

Harlow, T. J.; Korsu, H.; Almotwaly, L.; Corcoran, M. I.; Cole, S.; Chrobak, J. J.; Read, H. L.

2026-04-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.23.720427 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lateralized alpha-band oscillations are thought to reflect distractor inhibition through suppression of cortical regions processing spatially-localized distracting stimuli. Standard lateralization indices (LI) quantify hemispheric asymmetries in spectral power over large time windows, while characterizations of the time-varying dynamics of alpha-mediated distractor inhibition are lacking. Here we evaluate comparison scanning generalized eigendecomposition (csGED), a multivariate signal processing technique, for its efficacy in addressing questions related to alpha-mediated distractor inhibition using a simulation of same-frequency sources at symmetric cortical locations adapted from Zuure and Cohen (2021). We show that while LI accurately captures topographic power asymmetries, csGED is effective at recovering source-projections for bilateral, same-frequency activity across a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). We further extend these models to a pilot sample (N = 11) performing a speech-in-noise task using spatialized naturalistic distractors through individualized head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). Our results demonstrate the efficacy of GED to characterize source projections during spatialized distractors, and provide preliminary evidence for shifts in oscillatory activity in both the alpha (7 - 13 Hz) and beta frequency ranges (15 - 25 Hz) during spatialized speech-in-noise tasks. Together, these results demonstrate the feasibility of csGED for investigating temporal dynamics of lateralized distractor inhibition and motivate larger confirmatory studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.7%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
8
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
10
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
12
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
19
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%