Back

Micromolar concentrations of metabolites enable coexistence of bacterial species in chemostats

Ulrich, E.; Mitri, S.

2026-04-27 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.23.720424 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Competition for a single limiting resource is expected to lead to competitive exclusion, yet diverse microbial communities persist even in nutrient-poor environments. Cross-feeding of essential metabolites is one mechanism that can promote coexistence between species, but its contribution is difficult to pinpoint experimentally. Here, we studied a prototroph-auxotroph pair growing on a single carbon source in chemostats. In minimal medium, the prototroph Comamonas testosteroni (Ct) supplied thiamine to the thiamine-auxotroph Ochrobactrum anthropi (Oa), allowing stable coexistence in agreement with consumer-resource theory. Contrary to our expectation that supplying thiamine would remove the dependency and lead to exclusion of Ct, coexistence persisted even when thiamine was supplemented. Our theoretical anlaysis showed that coexistence between competitors can be maintained by trace concentrations of an additional metabolite if it is taken up at sufficiently high affinity by the weaker competitor. Consistent with this prediction, targeted metabolomics and spent-medium assays identified growth-enhancing compounds at micromolar concentrations in Oa spent medium and as residues in fresh medium. Model analysis further showed that such weak positive effects can qualitatively change coexistence outcomes in chemostats while remaining undetected in standard batch interaction assays. Together, our results show that trace metabolites and subtle positive effects can reshape coexistence outcomes and should be incorporated into ecological models and interaction measurements.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
6
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
7
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
11
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
14
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
15
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
23
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%