Back

Electric signal polymorphism predicts dietary niche partitioning in a weakly electric fish

Picq, S.; Gorsuch, R.; Bills, R.; Koenig, L.; Ngoua Aba'a, N.; Nzigou, F.; Mipounga, H. K.; Knobloch, E. C.; Schmidt, R. C.; Parkanzky, E.; Benbow, M. E.; Gallant, J. R.

2026-04-27 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.23.720378 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Electric organ discharge (EOD) waveform diversity in African elephantfish is often attributed to sexual selection, yet EODs also mediate active electrolocation during prey detection, raising the possibility that natural selection on foraging ecology contributes to waveform divergence. Paramormyrops kingsleyae exhibits an intraspecific polymorphism where certain populations emit biphasic EODs whereas other populations emit triphasic waveforms. The genes underlying this polymorphism show signatures of selection; the polymorphism persists despite gene flow and is behaviorally discriminable by the fish themselves. If waveform differences influence prey detection during active electrolocation, biphasic and triphasic fish should consume systematically different prey. We tested this prediction using DNA metabarcoding of gut contents from 186 mormyrids representing 16 species across eight sites in Gabon, employing two independent COI primer sets for cross-validation and pairing dietary data with environmental invertebrate sampling to distinguish active prey preference from passive availability. At the community level in the diverse Bale Creek mormyrid assemblage, species identity was the dominant predictor of diet composition (R{superscript 2} {approx} 24%), consistent with phylogenetic signal in foraging ecology. Within P. kingsleyae, waveform type was the strongest independent predictor of dietary composition (R{superscript 2} = 5-6%), explaining variance independently of geographic region, sex, body size, and parasitism status -- a result concordant across both primer sets. Dietary differences were driven by prey species turnover rather than differential abundance of shared prey, and prey selectivity analyses confirmed that waveform types differ in which prey they actively prefer, not merely in what is locally available. These findings are consistent with natural selection on foraging ecology contributing to the maintenance of EOD waveform polymorphism, though the sensory mechanisms linking subtle waveform differences to prey detection remain an open question.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
13.9%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
3
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.1%
5
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
9
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
10
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
17
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
24
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%