Back

Generative Augmentation Reveals Previously Overlooked Signals in Transcriptomic Datasets

Sethi, T.; Anand, A.; Pratiti, M.; Ali, S. Y.; Kamra, S.; Verma, S.; Singh, S.; Bajaj, T.

2026-04-27 genomics
10.64898/2026.04.23.720348 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying robust gene expression signatures from transcriptomic studies with small sample sizes remains one of the most persistent challenges in computational biology. Gene expression datasets have thousands of features but only a handful of biological samples. This presents the classic p >> n imbalance, which limits statistical power and makes it difficult to discover reliable biomarkers. In imaging, generative models such as GANs, VAEs, and diffusion models have demonstrated promising applications in data augmentation, but their usefulness for omics data has not been systematically tested. More importantly, no existing framework integrates synthetic data generation, stability-aware signature discovery, and multi-source biological validation into a single pipeline. In this work, we present GeneLift, with the hypothesis that a computational pipeline of generative data augmentation, stability testing, and evaluating biological evidence will aid novel gene-signature discovery in small-cohort transcriptomic studies. We tested this hypothesis across 36 microarray datasets covering five diseases: sepsis, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, tuberculosis, and diabetes. A component-wise testing of GeneLift revealed that Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) outperformed deep generative approaches and faithfully reproduced gene-level distributions. By a novel approach of titrating the level of augmentation, we identified biologically meaningful gene candidates that did not appear in the original, underpowered analyses. We also developed BayesScore, a Bayesian posterior probability of gene-disease association computed from PubMed co-occurrence, which both recovers well-characterised disease genes missed by standard differential expression and surfaces candidates whose disease relevance was independently confirmed in subsequent publications, with lead times of up to 18 years between the source dataset and the first disease-specific citation. GeneLift is freely available at tavlab-iiitd/GeneLift. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=103 SRC="FIGDIR/small/720348v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13c8aeeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c5277corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a35664org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17cdc48_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
12.3%
2
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
4
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
7
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
10
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
14
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
18
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
19
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
21
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
27
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
30
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%