Back

Myocardial Tug-of-War Is a Determinant of Left Ventricular Function and Failure

Harbo, M. B.; Sadeghinia, M. J.; Reyes, Y. D. M.; Simitev, R. D.; Li, J.; Blom, K. B.; Storas, T. H.; Rosseland, V.; Klow, N. E.; Stokke, M. K.; Broch, K.; Wall, S.; Sundnes, J.; Birkeland, J. A.; Andersen, G. O.; Louch, W. E.; Smith, G. L.; Sjaastad, I.; Espe, E. K. S.

2026-04-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.23.26351629 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a leading cause of death worldwide, characterized by impaired left ventricular systolic function. Contractile, structural, and electrophysiological changes underpin this impairment, but how these changes collectively determine ventricular function remains unclear. We hypothesize that their integrated action involves a complex mechanical interplay at the myocardial mesoscale level, intermediate between individual cardiomyocytes and the global left ventricle. Methods: We acquired high-resolution magnetic resonance images of healthy individuals and patients with myocardial infarction, and developed an analytical method to characterize in vivo contraction patterns in millimeter-sized myocardial units (i.e., at the mesoscale). Furthermore, we employed computational models to examine how mesoscale contraction patterns relate to the contraction mechanism, structure, and electrophysiology of the left ventricle. Results: At the left ventricular mesoscale, we observed that weakly contracting myocardial units are transiently elongated by the contraction of adjacent, more strongly contracting units. These mesoscale interactions generate a ?tug-of-war? that pervades the left ventricle in healthy hearts and becomes particularly prominent following myocardial infarction. This behavior is macroscopically invisible as the contraction patterns of opposing units cancel each other out, but it nevertheless shapes the efficiency of mechanical performance. In the healthy heart, recruitment of more uniformly contracting units (i.e., reduction in tug-of-war) supports augmented contractility during acute stress. However, following myocardial infarction, excessive tug-of-war contributes to impaired contractile efficiency and performance. Computational modelling showed that the ventricular contraction mechanism, structure, and electrophysiology underpin this behavior in healthy hearts and exacerbate it in disease. Conclusion: Left ventricular systolic function is characterized by a myocardial tug-of-war at the mesoscale, which contributes to the heart's adaptability in health and its vulnerability in disease. These findings introduce a new concept for understanding left ventricular function and a novel analytical approach for investigating its failure.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.9%
3
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.3%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
6
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
7
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
9
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
10
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
12
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
13
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
15
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
19
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%