Back

Semaglutide is associated with improved breast cancer survival, lower metastatic burden, and a dose-survival relationship uncoupled from weight-loss magnitude

Murugadoss, K.; Venkatakrishnan, A. J.; Soundararajan, V.

2026-04-24 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.23.26351609 medRxiv
Show abstract

Metabolic dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for poor outcomes in breast cancer, but whether incretin-based therapies confer survival benefit beyond weight loss remains unresolved. Using a federated electronic health record platform spanning nearly 29 million patients, we evaluated breast cancer survival after semaglutide and tirzepatide initiation in routine care. In 1:1 propensity-matched pooled-comparator analyses, semaglutide was associated with improved overall survival versus metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor users, with 54 deaths among 2,433 semaglutide users (2.2%) versus 395 deaths among 2,433 comparators (16.2%) over 24 months (log-rank P < 0.001). Tirzepatide showed a favorable survival association relative to pooled anti-diabetic comparators that did not meet statistical significance (P = 0.24), with 3 deaths among 220 users (1.4%) versus 64 deaths among 220 comparators (29.1%). In a head-to-head propensity-score-matched comparison, overall survival did not differ significantly between semaglutide- and tirzepatide-treated patients with pre-existing breast cancer (2,117 per arm; P = 0.12). In semaglutide-treated patients alive and observable at the 1-year landmark, higher maximum dose achieved was significantly associated with lower post-landmark mortality (P = 0.034), with an event rate of approximately 1.0% in the high-dose group ([&ge;]1.7 mg) versus approximately 4.5% in the low-dose group (0.25-1.0 mg). Despite a linear dose-weight loss relationship for semaglutide, however, weight-loss strata did not separate survival outcomes (global P = 0.22). In tirzepatide-treated patients alive and observable at the same landmark, neither maximum dose achieved nor weight-loss strata separated post-landmark survival (P = 0.98 and P = 0.50, respectively). Structured EHR and AI-based clinical-note analyses further showed significantly lower frequency of documented metastatic disease in semaglutide-treated patients relative to pooled anti-diabetic comparators, including any metastasis (7.0% versus 15.0%, rate ratio 0.5, P < 0.001), bone metastasis (1.0% versus 5.2%, rate ratio 0.2, P < 0.001), and liver, lung, or brain metastases (all P < 0.001). LLM-derived cause-of-death extraction further showed a 60% lower relative proportion of cancer-associated deaths in semaglutide-treated patients (19% of ascertainable deaths) than in matched pooled anti-diabetic comparators (47% of ascertainable deaths), with comparator deaths more often attributed to cancer progression involving metastatic breast cancer, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, and cancer-driven organ failure. Overall, this study demonstrates that semaglutide use in patients with pre-existing breast cancer is associated with a dose-correlated but weight-loss independent improvement in overall survival. These findings motivate prospective trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists in breast cancer across various stages and treatment settings.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
3
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.2%
5
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
12
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
18
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
20
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
22
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
24
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%