Back

Generalizing intensive care AI across time scales in resource-limited settings

Devadiga, A.; Singh, P.; Sankar, J.; Lodha, R.; Sethi, T.

2026-04-24 health informatics
10.64898/2026.04.23.26351588 medRxiv
Show abstract

Temporal resolution of physiological monitoring in intensive care varies widely across healthcare systems. Artificial intelligence models assume a uniform and fixed frequency of sampling, thus limiting the generalizability of models, especially to resource-limited settings. Here, we propose a novel resolution-transfer task for physiological time series and ask whether models trained on high-resolution data can generalize to a low data-density setting without the need to retrain them. SafeICU, a novel longitudinal pediatric intensive care dataset spanning ten years from a tertiary care hospital in India, was used to test this hypothesis. Self-supervised transformer models were trained on 144,271 patient-hours of high-resolution physiological signals from 984 pediatric ICU stays to learn representations of heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and arterial blood pressure. Transfer of this model to low-resolution data established robust performance in clinically relevant lower-frequency intervals, consistently outperforming models trained directly at coarser resolutions. Further, these representations generalized across patient populations, maintaining performance when evaluated on adult intensive care cohorts from the MIMIC-III and eICU databases without retraining. In a downstream task of early shock prediction, models achieved strong discrimination in the pediatric cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.87; area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) 0.92) and retained stable performance across monitoring intervals from 10 to 60 minutes (AUROC 0.78-0.88). Together, these results demonstrate that physiological representations learned from high-resolution data enable time-scale-robust and transferable AI for intensive care. The publicly released SafeICU dataset, comprising longitudinal vital signs, laboratory measurements, treatment records, microbiology, and admission and discharge, provides a foundation for developing and deploying generalizable clinical AI in resource-limited settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.6%
2
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
6
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
7
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
8
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
11
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
16
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
26
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%