Back

A prognostic signature based on ectopic reactivation of eight tissue-specific genes in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.

Montaut, E.; Rainville, V.; Betton-Fraisse, P.; Merre, W.; Khedimallah, S.; Govin, J.; Rousseaux, S.; Khochbin, S.; Jardin, F.; Ruminy, P.; Bourova-Flin, E.; Emadali, A.; Carras, S.

2026-04-27 hematology
10.64898/2026.04.23.26351580 medRxiv
Show abstract

Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma in the Western world. First-line immunochemotherapy fails in approximately 30-40% of patients, with refractory and relapse patients presenting a dismal prognosis. Currently, these high-risk patients cannot be accurately identified at diagnosis. Using statistical modeling and machine learning approaches applied to large public DLBCL datasets, we identified a novel predictive signature based on the reactivation of eight normally silent tissue-dependent genes associated with survival. We then developed a multiplex RT-MLPseq based assay, compatible with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples and transferable into routine clinical practice, enabling analysis of expression of these eight genes and validated their prognosis impact in an independent real-life cohort. This signature could be integrated with current prognostic indices and molecular classifications to improve patient stratification and guide treatment selection toward a personalized theragnostic approach, thereby enhancing management of non-responder patients. Data Sharing StatementFor access to original data, please contact: anouk.emadali@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr Key points- Ectopic activation of 8 tissue-specific genes defines a robust prognostic signature for survival stratification in DLBCL patients - A FFPE-compatible RT-MLPseq assay enables clinical use and improves risk stratification beyond IPI and COO, especially in high-risk patients

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.