Back

Duplication within 14q32.13 implicates a chimeric CLMN::SYNE3 RNA transcript in cerebellar ataxia

Litster, T. M.; Wilcox, R. A.; Carroll, R.; Gardner, A. E.; Nazri, N. M.; Shoubridge, C. A.; Delatycki, M. B.; Lohmann, K.; Agzarian, M.; Turella Divani, R.; Rafehi, H.; Scott, L.; Monahan, G.; Lamont, P. J.; Ashton, C.; Laing, N. G.; Ravenscroft, G.; Bahlo, M.; Haan, E.; Lockhart, P. J.; Friend, K. L.; Corbett, M. A.; Gecz, J.

2026-04-24 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.04.23.26350376 medRxiv
Show abstract

The spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are a clinically heterogenous group of neurodegenerative disorders that affect movement, vision, speech and balance. Here, we reassign the linkage of SCA30 to 14q32.13 based on a cumulative LOD score >12. Within this interval we identified a 331 kb duplication, absent in population controls and not observed in >800 unrelated individuals with genetically unresolved cerebellar ataxia. RNASeq analysis of patient-derived lymphoblastoid cell lines revealed a splice-mediated chimeric transcript resulting from the duplication event. This transcript joined exon 1 of CLMN to exon 2 of SYNE3. In silico translation predicted that this chimeric transcript would produce a short N-terminal peptide corresponding to exon 1 of CLMN and the usually untranslated region of exon 2 of SYNE3 fused to the complete and in-frame SYNE3 protein. Transient overexpression of SYNE3 or the CLMN::SYNE3 fusion protein, in both HeLa cells and mouse primary cortical neurons, resulted in equivalent cellular outcomes including altered nuclear morphology and chromosomal DNA fragmentation. SYNE3 forms part of the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton complex and is not usually expressed in cerebellar Purkyn[e] neurons while, CLMN has a Purkyn[e] specific expression pattern within the brain. Our data suggests that ectopic expression of SYNE3 in cerebellar Purkyn[e] neurons, mediated by the CLMN promoter, leads to cerebellar atrophy and causes spinocerebellar ataxia in the SCA30 family. This is an example of Mendelian disease arising from a novel, chimeric transcript with a likely dominant negative effect. Chimeric transcripts are commonly associated with cancers, but they are not often associated with monogenic disorders. Detection of chimeric transcripts as part of structural variant analysis could increase the genetic diagnostic yield of Mendelian disorders.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 11%
14.2%
2
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
3
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.1%
4
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
5
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
7
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
9
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
11
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
13
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%