Back

Food preference is associated with distinct large-scale cortical functional connectivity patterns during food-image observation

Sugata, H.; Kim, S.; Ikeda, T.; Hara, M.

2026-04-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.22.720279 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Food preference influences behavior toward food-related stimuli, yet the large-scale neural mechanisms underlying this process remain unclear. This study investigated whether preferred and nonpreferred food cues are associated with distinct patterns of cortical functional connectivity during the observation of food images. Data from 25 of the 40 recruited healthy adults were included in the final analysis after excluding individuals with highly unbalanced response tendencies. Participants viewed 150 food images and rated each image on a four-point preference scale. Trials were classified as favorite food (FF) or disliked food (DF). High-density electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded during the task, and source-level ROI-to-ROI functional connectivity was analyzed using amplitude envelope correlation in the alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-25 Hz) frequency bands over the 1000-ms period after food-picture onset. Response time did not differ significantly between FF and DF trials. However, distinct functional connectivity patterns were observed between conditions in both frequency bands. In the alpha band, FF trials involved a network including the cuneus, parietal regions, cingulate regions, and lateral occipital cortex, whereas DF trials involved the isthmus cingulate, caudal middle frontal gyrus, inferior temporal cortex, superior parietal lobule, and lateral occipital cortex. In the beta band, FF trials involved the isthmus cingulate, precuneus, parietal regions, and pericalcarine cortex, whereas DF trials additionally involved frontal regions, including the superior frontal gyrus and pars triangularis. These findings indicate that food preference is associated with distinct large-scale cortical functional connectivity patterns during food image observation, suggesting differential neural processing of preferred and nonpreferred food cues.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
7
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
12
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
21
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
26
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
29
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
30
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%