Back

Comparative Genomics of Bovine and Human Fusobacterium necrophorum Strains Reveal Subspecies- and Host-associated Differences in Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance

Kilama, J.; Holman, D. B.; Abbasi, M. A.; Amachawadi, R. G.; Nagaraja, T. G.; Dahlen, C. R.; Amat, S.

2026-04-23 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.22.720273 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fusobacterium necrophorum (FN) is an important opportunistic pathogen implicated in necrotizing infections, including liver abscesses, calf diphtheria, metritis, and foot rot in cattle, and tonsillopharyngitis in humans. However, FN also exists as a commensal member of the bovine reproductive microbiota with potential negative, as in metritis, and even positive associations with pregnancy outcomes. The genomic features that enable FN to colonize diverse hosts and anatomical niches as either a commensal or a pathogen is poorly understood. We addressed these knowledge gaps by performing comparative genomic analysis of 137 FN strains (80 newly sequenced, 57 publicly available) from clinical and non-clinical sources across human and bovine hosts. We investigated the pangenome structure, virulence gene repertoire, antimicrobial resistance genes (ARG) prevalence, as well as host-and subspecies-associated genomic signatures of two FN subspecies: subsp. necrophorum (FNN) and subsp. funduliforme (FNF). Comparative genomics revealed an open pangenome with high accessory diversity, and phylogenetic analysis separated the strains into two distinct subspecies clades. Functional profiling revealed substantial metabolic divergence between subspecies, with FNN showing higher prevalence of carbohydrate transport systems and advanced glycation-related pathways, while FNF showed enrichment in threonate metabolism and hemolysin-related systems. Virulence gene analysis identified 84 variants across multiple functional categories with subspecies- and host-specific distributions. Antimicrobial resistance genes, primarily tetracycline resistance genes [tet(O), tet(M), tet(40)] and the macrolide resistance gene erm(B), were detected in 22.6% of strains, with higher prevalence in bovine than human strains. Overall, our results suggest that pathogenic potential of FN appears to be determined by the interplay between an open pangenome, subspecies-specific metabolic and virulence repertoires, host-associated adaptation, and niche specialization. IMPORTANCEFusobacterium necrophorum, comprising two subspecies, necrophorum (FNN) and funduliforme (FNF), is a major pathogen in cattle and humans, yet it also occurs as a commensal inhabitant in healthy cattle, particularly in the rumen, hindgut, semen, and the female reproductive tract. However, emerging evidence indicates it also occurs as a non-clinical inhabitant, particularly in the bovine reproductive tract, where it may be associated with improved pregnancy outcomes. We conducted a comparative genomic analysis of 137 F. necrophorum strains, including FNN (n = 12) and FNF (n = 125), sourced from humans (n=53) and cattle (n=84) across seven anatomical niches spanning both healthy and diseased sources. We identified subspecies- and host-specific metabolic pathways, antimicrobial resistance profiles, and distinct virulence gene distributions that underpin the ecological versatility of Fusobacterium necrophorum. Overall, these findings provide a genomic framework for understanding its host adaptation and niche specialization across bovine and human hosts.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.3%
3
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
9
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
16
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
18
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
22
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
26
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
28
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
29
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
30
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%