Back

Turnip mosaic virus-based gRNA delivery system for plant genome editing

Khwanbua, E.; Lappe, R. R.; Bierl, A. A.; Whitham, S.

2026-04-24 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.22.720221 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant virus-based gRNA delivery systems offer a rapid alternative to stable transformation for CRISPR-mediated genome editing, but potyvirus-based platforms in Cas9-expressing plants are still underexplored. Here, we developed a turnip mosaic virus (TuMV)-based system for gRNA delivery in Cas9-expressing Nicotiana benthamiana and tested whether Csy4-mediated gRNA processing could improve editing efficiency. A TuMV construct carrying a gRNA targeting PHYTOENE DESATURASE (NbPDS) induced detectable editing in both infiltrated and systemic tissues, although editing frequencies were low. Incorporation of the bacterial endoribonuclease Csy4 increased editing efficiencies in the two NbPDS genes, raising editing in infiltrated leaves to 7.1-13.8% for NbPDSa and 7.6-23.0% for NbPDSb, while lower but reproducible editing was detectable in systemic leaves. The TuMV-Csy4 platform also supported editing of a second endogenous target, MAGNESIUM CHELATASE SUBUNIT H (NbChlH), and enabled multiplex editing of NbPDS and NbChlH regardless of guide order. Editing efficiencies were consistently higher in infiltrated leaves than in systemic leaves, and no visible photobleaching or chlorosis was observed in systemic tissues despite confirmed molecular editing. To assess the potential for heritable editing, a tRNAIle mobility element was fused to the NbPDS gRNA. Although this construct increased somatic editing, no albino progeny were recovered after screening approximately 20,000 seedlings, indicating that heritable editing was not achieved under these conditions. Together, these results establish TuMV as a platform for Cas9-based gRNA delivery and show that Csy4-mediated processing improves editing efficiency, supports multiplex targeting, and demonstrates the feasibility of potyvirus-based genome editing systems in plants.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.3%
3
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
7
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.5%
14
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
17
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
21
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%