Back

Cross-Species Adaptation of RETFound for Rodent OCT Age Estimation Reveals Strong CNN Baselines in Data-Scarce Space Biology

Hayati, A.; Gong, J.; Nagesh, V.; Avci, P.; Ong, A. Y.; Masalkhi, M.; Engelmann, J.; Karouia, F.; Scott, R. T.; Keane, P. A.; Costes, S. V.; Sanders, L. M.

2026-04-26 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.22.720210 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Space-biology imaging studies are often constrained by severe data scarcity, limiting the development of robust machine-learning biomarkers. Rodent spaceflight and space-analog datasets provide an important preclinical setting for testing transfer-learning strategies, but the extent to which human retinal foundation models can generalize to rodent optical coherence tomography (OCT) remains unclear. Here, we benchmark cross-species adaptation of RETFound, a human retinal Vision Transformer pretrained on 1.6 million retinal images, for chronological age prediction from Brown Norway rat OCT B-scans in the NASA Open Science Data Repository dataset OSD-679. We adapted RETFound using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and evaluated performance on control animals under matched 3-fold rat-level cross-validation. We compared RETFound+LoRA with a strong ImageNet-pretrained Xception baseline under matched protocols and included a scratch/random ViT as a supplementary negative-control architecture check. Metrics included mean absolute error (MAE), R2, and inter-eye mean absolute difference (MAD). RETFound+LoRA achieved MAE = 26.20 {+/-} 5.03 days with R2 = 0.744 {+/-} 0.049. However, Xception performed better in the primary benchmark (MAE = 19.01 {+/-} 7.67 days, R2 = 0.853 {+/-} 0.082), and the matched-fold comparison favored Xception, although this result should be interpreted cautiously given the small number of folds. Inter-eye consistency was maintained across the matched control evaluation, and saliency maps localized model attention to anatomically plausible inner retinal regions. Together, these results show that human retinal foundation models can transfer to rodent OCT in a scientifically useful way, but also that strong CNN baselines may outperform transformer-based models in small-sample cross-species settings. This preprint provides a reproducible benchmark and baseline framework for future retinal biomarker development in space biology. Significance StatementSpace-biology imaging studies are intrinsically data-limited. This preprint provides a reproducible cross-species benchmark for adapting Earth-trained retinal models to rodent OCT under small-sample conditions, highlights the value of strong CNN baselines, and offers a reusable starting point for future retinal biomarker development in space-relevant datasets.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.2%
3
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
4
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
5
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.3%
6
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.0%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.3%
8
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
9
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.5%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
npj Microgravity
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
16
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.6%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
20
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
22
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
25
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
26
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
27
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
28
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%