Back

Hierarchical Breakdown of RNA Structure Prediction in CASP16: From Reliable Local Features to Speculative Multimer Assembly

Nithin, C.; Pilla, S. P.; Kmiecik, S.

2026-04-23 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.22.720187 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CASP16 provided a community-wide benchmark for assessing RNA structure prediction, including the first large-scale blind assessment of RNA-RNA multimer prediction. The results showed that achieving high atomic precision remains a major challenge across the field. In this work, we use the performance of our group (LCBio) as a diagnostic case study to examine the current limits of RNA structure prediction. Our workflow ranked first in the RNA multimer category and remained competitive for monomers. We combine hierarchical analysis with representative case studies to identify a pattern of predictive breakdown, in which modeling fidelity degrades from reliable local features to increasingly speculative global architectures. Multi-helix junctions appear to mark a major transition boundary where 2D topological success often fails to translate into 3D geometric realism, leading to cascading errors in global architecture. This hierarchical breakdown is especially pronounced in RNA multimers, where limitations in the recovery of junction geometry and tertiary interactions propagate directly into errors in higher-order assembly, making multimer prediction increasingly speculative. By placing benchmark performance in a direct structural context, this case study helps define the current limits of RNA structure prediction and highlights priorities for improving predictive accuracy. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=115 SRC="FIGDIR/small/720187v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (19K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c3fe1aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5f80beorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fd5e0aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@128f708_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Key PointsO_LIRNA structure prediction in CASP16 shows a hierarchical decline in accuracy, from relatively reliable local secondary structure to increasingly uncertain global architecture and multimer assembly. C_LIO_LIPrediction accuracy declines markedly at the level of multi-helix junctions, where correct 2D topology often does not translate into realistic 3D geometry. C_LIO_LINon-canonical interactions, stacking geometry, and specialized tertiary motifs remain major sources of error in current RNA modeling pipelines. C_LIO_LIHigh relative performance in RNA-RNA multimer prediction can be achieved despite limited atomic accuracy, highlighting the importance of expert-guided assembly and model curation. C_LIO_LIMany current multimer models are better interpreted as coarse-grained organizational hypotheses than as precise atomic structures. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
14.7%
2
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
6
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
7
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
9
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
12
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
16
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
18
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
28
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
30
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%