Back

Comparative proteomics reveals a conserved core of tegumental proteins in parasitic flatworms.

Guarnaschelli, I.; Lima, A.; Velazco, R.; Bergmann, M.; Preza, M.; Calvelo, J.; Cucher, M.; Rosenzvit, M. C.; Brehm, K.; Iriarte, A.; Koziol, U.

2026-04-24 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.22.720116 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Parasitic flatworms, including cestodes and trematodes, are covered by a specialized syncytial tegument that mediates nutrient uptake and host-parasite interactions. While the tegument of trematodes has been extensively characterized, its molecular composition in cestodes remains largely unknown. In this work, we performed a comparative proteomic analysis of the tegument of three cestode species, including larval and adult stages: Hymenolepis microstoma, Mesocestoides corti (syn. M. vogae) and Echinococcus multilocularis. Using stringent enrichment criteria relative to whole-worm extracts, we identified hundreds of tegument-enriched proteins in each species. Comparative analyses revealed a conserved core of tegumental proteins shared among all three species, including members of the Tegument Allergen-Like (TAL) family, vesicular trafficking components and calcium-sensing proteins, and identified candidates for nutrient uptake activities such as glucose and nucleoside transporters. Further comparative analyses revealed a set of shared tegumental proteins with the trematode Schistosoma mansoni, including conserved proteins that are specific to parasitic flatworms, supporting the existence of a conserved ancestral tegumental proteome. Finally, we confirmed tegumental expression of several candidate genes in H. microstoma and E. multilocularis, and demonstrated regionally restricted gene expression among tegumental cytons, suggesting functional specialization within the syncytial tegument. Altogether, these results reveal an evolutionarily conserved composition of the tegument of parasitic flatworms, providing a foundation for future work targeting this critical host-parasite interface.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
International Journal for Parasitology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Virulence
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
19
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
24
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%