Back

Multiple-Demand Network encoding geometry balances generalization and dimensionality during novel task assembly.

Palenciano, A. F.; Pena, P.; Woolgar, A.; Gonzalez-Garcia, C.; Ruz, M.

2026-04-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.22.720093 bioRxiv
Show abstract

On the basis of verbal instructions, humans can accomplish novel and diverse demands at the very first try. This complex phenomenon recruits structured brain activity across the frontoparietal Multiple Demand Network (MDN), which is thought to encode upcoming task parameters and guide behavior. Nonetheless, it is still uncertain how novel instructions are translated into efficient neural task representations. To address this, we collected functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data while participants followed a rich set of novel verbal instructions. These varied along three core dimensions: the overarching task demand (to select or to integrate stimuli information), the relevant target category (animate or inanimate items), and the visual feature that participants responded to (color or shape). Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) was used to examine the informational content and format of MDN distributed activity. We contrasted two alternative representational geometries that may underpin novel task coding: low-dimensional spaces based on abstract and generalizable representations and high-dimensional architectures hosting context-unique, conjunctive neural codes. Our results show that anticipatory activity in the MDN was sensitive to the content of instructions. While the selection vs. integration task demands were broadly encoded within this network, coding of the relevant categories and features was restricted to lateral MDN regions, namely, the intraparietal sulcus and the inferior frontal junction. Critically, the representational spaces across the MDN displayed a mixture of geometrical motifs, partially supporting our two alternative hypotheses. On the one hand, Cross-Condition Generalization Performance revealed the presence of abstract and transferable neural codes, although only for task demand information. On the other hand, Shattering Dimensionality showed complex, high-dimensional coding spaces across the MDN, structured around both task-informative and non-informative axes. Still, no evidence of conjunctive neural codes was observed. Overall, these findings highlight that novel instructed behavior may recruit both abstraction and high dimensionality to promote generalization while still maximizing the expressivity of MDN coding spaces. More broadly, they stress the role of the encoding geometry for a computational understanding of cognitive control processes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
13.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.0%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.7%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
8.1%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.1%
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
8
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.6%
9
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
11
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
12
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.8%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
18
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
21
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
23
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%