Back

Long-range seeding drives exponential growth in early respiratory viral infection

Hvid, U.; Nielsen, B. F.; sneppen, k.

2026-04-24 immunology
10.64898/2026.04.22.720070 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Respiratory viruses spread within the host through both local expansion and occasional long-range dissemination that seeds new infection foci. We present LEAP, an analytically tractable within-host model that captures this two-scale process by coupling local plaque growth to long-range seeding. The model reduces to an age-dependent branching process and yields a closed-form expression for the exponential growth rate during early infection. Using empirical data to parametrize the model, we find that productive dissemination requires only a small number of successful long-range seeding events per infected cell, with distinct values for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus. LEAP further predicts that, in these well-adapted viruses, interferon-mediated restriction only weakly affects exponential growth, while remaining decisive for poorly adapted ones. More broadly, the model provides a flexible framework for experimentally testable predictions of early infection dynamics. Significance StatementRespiratory viral infection is an inherently spatial process, in which the virus must colonize large areas of the airways to optimize reproduction. Recent studies in animal models infected with influenza A or SARS-CoV-2 have documented long-range stochastic jumps of viral populations between distant regions of the respiratory tract. The emerging picture is one of two co-occurring spatial processes: slow, local plaque expansion and long-range seeding events that are rare but crucial to rapid colonization of the airways. We introduce LEAP (Lotka-Euler Airway Pathogen model), a simple mathematical within-host model that captures these two-scale dynamics by coupling local plaque growth to stochastic long-range seeding. Using LEAP, measurements from the petri dish can directly produce predictions of infection dynamics in the body.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.4%
2
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.8%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.0%
7
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
8
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.2%
10
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.0%
13
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
17
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
21
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%