Back

Softer substrates mechanical primes sustained and metabolically fit CD8+ T cells for anti-tumor activity

Alatoom, A.; Sapudom, J.; Elkhoury, K.; Deliorman, M.; Khair, M.; Rezgui, R.; Vijayavenkataraman, S.; Qasaimeh, M.; Teo, J.

2026-04-24 immunology
10.64898/2026.04.22.720068 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adoptive T cell therapy for solid tumors is limited by poor persistence of CD8+ T cells, a dysfunction that is often programmed during ex vivo expansion. Here, we show that, when biochemical inputs are held constant,substrate mechanics alone can direct durable anti-tumor function in primary human CD8+ T cells. Using polyacrylamide (PA) hydrogels of defined stiffness (soft [~]1 kPa; stiff [~]55 kPa) in both flat and bead formats, we first establish that contact geometry dominates early activation, whereas substrate stiffness governs the 14-day expansion trajectory. Across the rapid expansion protocol, flat PA substrates sustain proliferation, limit PD-1/LAG-3 acquisition, and preserve a balanced effector-regulatory cytokine profile. In contrast, Dynabeads-expanded cells exhibit net cell loss and a more pronounced decline in cytokine output over time. To define the underlying programs, RNA-seq identifies a 125-gene biomimetic core shared by both PA conditions but absent from Dynabeads, encompassing proliferation, OXPHOS, mechanobiology, and a stem-like precursor (Tpex) signature. Consistent with these transcriptional differences, metabolic profiling shows that flat soft PA best preserves dual glycolytic and mitochondrial capacity at day 14, indicating enhanced bioenergetic flexibility. Functionally, PA-primed CD8+ T cells display superior cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells in both 2D and collagen-based 3D co-cultures, with this advantage maintained under matrix constraints that mimic solid tumor microenvironments. Together, these findings establish substrate mechanics as a tunable and functionally decisive design parameter for engineering durable, solid-tumor-effective CD8+ T cell products in preclinical in vitro models of solid tumors.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
3
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.2%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
6
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.6%
9
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
10
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
12
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
16
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
18
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
22
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
28
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%