Back

Volitional control of parieto-occipital alpha lateralization via neurofeedback does not influence auditory spatial attention

Stockar, F.; Ros, T.; Preisig, B. C.

2026-04-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.22.720048 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Auditory spatial attention, the ability to focus selectively on specific sounds while ignoring others, is crucial for everyday listening. Lateralized alpha oscillations over the parieto-occipital cortex have been proposed to act as a crossmodal attentional filter mechanism that allows to gate sensory processing by actively suppressing unattended locations. While prior evidence supports the functional role of this mechanism in visual attention, its role in auditory spatial attention remains debated. In this pre-registered EEG-neurofeedback study, participants were trained for 30 minutes to lateralize alpha power toward the left or right parieto-occipital cortex, while auditory probes from different spatial directions (-90{degrees}, -45{degrees}, 45{degrees}, and 90{degrees}) assessed whether online changes in alpha lateralization influenced auditory processing. Resting-state and task-based alpha lateralization, as well as gaze behavior were measured before and after training. Participants successfully modulated alpha lateralization in the trained direction during neurofeedback. However, shifting alpha lateralization did not cause changes in online auditory processing, as evidenced by the absence of asymmetric changes in auditory evoked responses to lateralized probe tones. Likewise, neurofeedback did not cause persistent changes in alpha lateralization during resting-state and task-based recordings after neurofeedback. Notably, neurofeedback training affected gaze behavior. Shifting alpha lateralization toward the left hemisphere during neurofeedback abolished a pre-existing rightward gaze bias in training responders, pointing to a dissociation between oculomotor and auditory attentional systems. These findings challenge the notion that parieto-occipital alpha lateralization serves as a universal crossmodal spatial gate, and raise important questions about the functional specificity of alpha-based neurofeedback interventions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
13.6%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.8%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.0%
5
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.4%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.4%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
12
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
14
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.6%
17
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
18
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
20
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%