Back

Reciprocal repulsions enforce heterotypic dendrite segregation in an olfactory circuit

Ji, H.; Li, J.; Xu, Y.; Wong, K. K. L.; Wu, Y.; Luginbuhl, D. J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Lee, J.; Jones, R. C.; Quake, S. R.; Arac, D.; Özkan, E.; Luo, L.

2026-04-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.22.719985 bioRxiv
Show abstract

How dendrites of different neurons segregate into discrete spatial domains during neural circuit assembly is poorly understood. Here, using the Drosophila olfactory system, we found that heterophilic interactions between two cell-surface proteins Teneurin-m (Ten-m) and Capricious (Caps) drive dendrite segregation. Ten-m and Caps are expressed in largely inverse patterns across projection neuron (PN) types when PNs are establishing their dendritic territories. Loss of Ten-m in Ten-m+ PNs causes their dendrites to invade Caps+ territories, whereas loss of Caps in Caps+ PNs causes dendrite invasion into Ten-m+ territories. Structure-guided mutations that abolish Ten-m-Caps binding disrupt dendrite segregation, whereas the same mutation on Ten-m preserves its homophilic attraction in a synaptic partner matching assay. These results support a model in which mutual repulsion between two inversely expressed cell-surface proteins drive dendrite segregation into discrete glomerular territories.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.3%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
11.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 11%
9.6%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
5.4%
7
Neuron
○ 337 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
9
Developmental Cell
○ 196 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
11
Nature Neuroscience
○ 252 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
13
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
● 1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
15
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
16
Development
● 497 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
18
Journal of Cell Biology
● 392 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.