Back

Tandem bromodomains of BRD4 cooperatively read poly-acetylated nucleosomes to enhance chromatin engagement and regulate breast cancer phenotypes

Burkholder, N. T.; Wu, S.-Y.; Handy, J.; Bertram, C.; Marunde, M. R.; Popova, I. K.; Krajewski, K.; Chiang, C.-M.; Strahl, B. D.

2026-04-24 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.04.22.719657 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) is an acetyl-lysine reader protein implicated in transcriptional control and oncogenesis, yet how its tandem bromodomains (BD1-2) contribute to nucleosomal engagement remains unresolved. Here we show that the tandem bromodomains of BRD4 cooperatively engage poly-acetylated histone H4 tails and nucleosomes in vitro and promote chromatin association in human cells. In stringent peptide pull-down and nucleosome-based biolayer interferometry assays, isolated BRD4 bromodomains bind weakly to poly-acetylated histone peptides and nucleosomes, whereas the tandem BD1-2 module binds much more robustly. These results closely mirror our observations in mammalian cells, where truncations lacking either bromodomain or pocket-disrupting mutations in either domain reduced chromatin association, with dual pocket disruption causing the strongest defect. In the BRD4 short isoform (BRD4-S), maximal chromatin association additionally required the region C-terminal to the BD2, which contains the basic residue-enriched interaction domain (BID) and extraterminal domain (ET), consistent with a multivalent chromatin engagement mechanism beyond the bromodomains alone. Functionally, dual pocket disruption attenuated BRD4-S-dependent breast cancer phenotypes, including impaired growth and reduced transwell migration. Together, these findings define how tandem bromodomains and adjacent BRD4-S regions cooperate to stabilize chromatin residence and inform therapeutic strategies aimed at more precisely disrupting BRD4 function. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=82 SRC="FIGDIR/small/719657v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (18K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12d03beorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@50cc45org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@92e3ecorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b1a26d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.1%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.9%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
6
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
10
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
12
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
16
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
17
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
19
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.6%
23
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%