Back

Increasing absolute prey community density protects aposematic models and their imperfect Batesian mimics: Evidence from Neotropical Adelpha butterflies

Robinson, A.; Camargo-Cely, A.; Speroff, S.; Meyersiek, J.; Mishi, M.; Fetherston, C.; Sanborn, K.; Osipovich, M.; Borzymowski, R.; Herrmann, J.; Finkbeiner, S.; Buston, P.; Mullen, S.

2026-04-23 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.22.719628 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Batesian mimicry is a defensive adaptation where predators learn to avoid aposematic prey and generalize their warning signals to phenotypically similar mimics. The phenotypic accuracy needed for mimics to benefit from this adaptation depends on the relative densities of models and mimics and the models unpalatability. As aposematic models become more unpalatable or more common relative to their mimics, warning signals become stronger, allowing even poor mimics to benefit. However, few studies have disentangled the importance of relative frequencies of models and mimics from absolute density of the prey community (both models and mimics) in driving relaxed selection on imperfect mimics. Here, we test the hypothesis that increasing model unpalatability and absolute prey community density accelerates predator avoidance learning and enhances protection for imperfect mimics. Using replicas of the model Adelpha iphiclus (Linnaeus), its imperfect mimic Adelpha serpa (Boisduval), and the palatable control Junonia evarete (Cramer), we conducted field experiments that enhanced model unpalatability and doubled absolute prey density while maintaining a constant ratio of model, mimic, and control phenotypes. We found that enhanced model unpalatability and increased absolute density significantly reduced predation on all species, highlighting absolute community density as an underappreciated mechanism shaping selection on imperfect Batesian mimics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.7%
4
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.6%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
7
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
9
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
10
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%