Back

The NMR Exchange Format (NEF): Specification and Applications

Ploskon, E.; Baskaran, K.; Tejero, R.; Schwieters, C. D.; Bardiaux, B.; Guentert, P.; Fogh, R. H.; Gutmanas, A.; Brooksbank, E. J.; Yokochi, M.; Wishart, D. S.; Wedell, J. R.; Vranken, W. F.; Thompson, D.; Thompson, G.; Smith, B. O.; Rehman, S.; Ramelot, T. A.; Ragan, T. J.; Perez, A.; Perera, B. L.; Peisach, E.; Nilges, M.; Mureddu, L. G.; Mondal, A.; Lubicka, E. A.; Liwo, A.; Kurisu, G.; Kobayashi, N.; Klukowski, P.; Johnston, B. A.; Huang, Y. J.; Hoch, J. C.; Higman, V. A.; Herrmann, T.; Hayward, M. W.; Garnet, J. A.; Case, D. A.; Burley, S. K.; Adams, P. D.; Montelione, G. T.; Vuister, G.

2026-04-24 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.04.22.715536 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The NMR Exchange Format (NEF) is a community-driven standard for representing NMR experimental data in a consistent, interoperable, and machine-readable form. Built on the STAR syntax, NEF provides a structured framework for storing and exchanging chemical shifts, peak lists, various types of structural restraints, and related metadata, thus allowing for data exchange across software platforms. By enabling direct, lossless transfer of information, NEF simplifies multi-software workflows, improves reproducibility, and supports FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles. We describe the NEF specification, its current implementation across commonly used NMR software packages, and its application in areas including biomolecular structure determination, metabolomics, and ligand screening. Testing demonstrates that NEF can be used to exchange complete datasets between programs without loss of information or functionality. We also outline recent developments and future directions, such as inclusion of NMR relaxation data and support for non-standard residue topologies. NEFs growing adoption highlights its potential as a unifying standard for NMR data, enabling more efficient, transparent and collaborative research.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
18.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
7
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
16
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
17
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
18
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
20
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
22
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
23
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
25
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
26
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%