Back

Comprehensive Exome Sequencing in Swedish Patients with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Gunnarsson, C.; Ellegard, R.; Ahsberg, J.; huda, s.; Andersson, J.; Dworeck, C. F.; Glaser, N.; Erlinge, D.; Loghman, H.; Johnston, N.; Mannila, M.; Pagonis, C.; Ravn-Fischer, A.; Rydberg, E.; Welen Schef, K.; Tornvall, P.; Sederholm Lawesson, S.; Swahn, E. E.

2026-04-24 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351535 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a well-recognised cause of acute coronary syndrome particularly among women without conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Increasing evidence indicates a genetic contribution; however, the underlying genetic architecture of SCAD remains insufficiently understood. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of rare variants in previously reported SCAD associated genes and to explore the potential presence of novel genetic alterations in well-characterised Swedish patients with SCAD. Methods The study comprised 201 patients enrolled in SweSCAD, a national project examining the clinical characteristics, aetiology, and outcomes of SCAD. All individuals had a confirmed diagnosis based on invasive coronary angiography. Comprehensive exome sequencing was performed to identify rare variants contributing to disease susceptibility. Results Genetic variants that have been associated with SCAD according to current clinical genetics practice for variant reporting were identified in approximately 4 % of patients. In addition, rare potentially relevant variants were detected in almost 60 % of patients in genes associated with vascular integrity and vascular remodelling. Conclusion This study supports SCAD as a genetically complex arteriopathy, driven by rare high?impact variants together with broader polygenic susceptibility. Variants in collagen, vascular extracellular matrix, and oestrogen?responsive pathways provide biologically plausible links to female?predominant disease. Although the diagnostic yield of clearly actionable variants is modest, these findings support broader genomic evaluation beyond overt syndromic presentations and highlight the need for larger integrative genomic and functional studies to refine risk stratification and management.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.0%
2
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
5
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
7
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
10
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
11
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
13
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
14
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%