Back

Central Adiposity And Infective Endocarditis: A Cohort Study of UK Biobank Participants

Song, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhipeng, W.; Sun, P.; Ke, Z.; Chenzhen, X.; chuanjie, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; He, L.; Yu, J.; Lai, Y.; Cui, H.; Ren, C.

2026-04-24 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351534 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Aims: While traditional anthropometric indices are established cardiovascular predictors, their prognostic value for incident infective endocarditis (IE) remains undefined. Methods: We included 386,859 participants (mean age 57.0 years; 52.9% female) from the UK Biobank between 2006 and 2010 with standardized baseline data on BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WhtR), and the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index.Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with restricted cubic splines were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of these indices, adjusting for demographic and clinical risk factors. Results: Over 16.87 median years (25th, 16.02; 75th, 17.60 percentile) of follow-up, there were a total of 1,124 incident IE events. During the follow-up period, 38,342 total deaths were recorded, of which 8,524 were cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related.Overall, compared to individuals with normal weight and baseline metabolic indices, those in the fourth quartile of WC, WHtR, and TyG index exhibited the highest risk of incident IE. Compared to other metabolic indices, WC (HR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.23?1.90,P < 0.001) and WHtR (HR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.20?1.78,P < 0.001) demonstrated higher relative increases in risk associated with IE. Furthermore, the risk of IE was significantly elevated among the younger population with abdominal obesity and concomitant diabetes. However, no significant increase in IE risk was observed among participants with pre-existing valvular heart disease (P = 0.796). Conclusion: Compared with BMI, higher WC and WHtR were robustly associated with increased risk of IE, even after adjusting for traditional risk factors. Furthermore, the risk of IE was markedly elevated among younger individuals with abdominal obesity and diabetes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
13.9%
2
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.2%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
5
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
6
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
7
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
8
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
12
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
17
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
19
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
23
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%