Back

Identifying SARS-CoV-2 Lineages that Share the Same Relative Effective Reproduction Numbers

Musonda, R.; Ito, K.; Omori, R.; Ito, K.

2026-04-24 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351531 medRxiv
Show abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has continuously evolved since its emergence in the human population in 2019. As of 1st August 2025, more than 1,700 Omicron subvariants have been designated by the Pango nomenclature system. The Pango nomenclature system designates a new lineage based on genetic and epidemiological information of SARS-CoV-2 strains. However, there is a possibility that strains that have similar genetic backgrounds and the same phenotype are given different Pango lineage names. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm, called FindPart-w, which can identify groups of viral lineages that share the same relative effective reproduction numbers. We introduced a new lineage replacement model, called the constrained RelRe model, which constrains groups of lineages to have the same relative effective reproduction numbers. The FindPart-w algorithm searches the equality constraints that minimise the Akaike Information Criterion of constrained RelRe models. Using hypothetical observation count data created by simulation, we found that the FindPart-w algorithm can identify groups of lineages having the same relative effective reproduction number in a practical computational time. Applying FindPart-w to actual real-world data of time-stamped lineage counts from the United States, we found that the Pango lineage nomenclature system may have given different lineage names to SARS-CoV-2 strains even if they have the same relative effective reproduction number and similar genetic backgrounds. In conclusion, this study showed that viruses that had the same relative effective reproduction number were identifiable from temporal count data of viral sequences. These findings will contribute to the future development of lineage designation systems that consider both genetic backgrounds and transmissibilities of lineages.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.5%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
3
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
4
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
6
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
8
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Virologica Sinica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
19
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
21
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
25
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
30
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%