Back

The Utility of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Biomarkers in Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy

Kumanan, K.; Hassani, A.; Husnain, M.; Papaefstratiou, E.; Estevez, J. J.

2026-04-27 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351527 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo evaluate associations between optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) metrics and diabetic retinopathy (DR) and compare their discrimination against conventional clinical risk factors. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 108 adult eyes (right eye if both eligible) with diabetes were recruited from tertiary ophthalmology/optometry clinics. DR was clinically graded using ETDRS categories and dichotomised as no DR vs [≥] mild NPDR (primary outcome). Macular 6x6 mm OCT-A (Zeiss AngioPlex) was acquired; scans with signal strength >7 and without major artefact were included. Quantitative metrics from the superficial capillary plexus included vessel density (VD) and perfusion density (PD) (central/inner/outer/full regions); structural OCT measures and FAZ parameters were secondary. Associations with [≥] mild NPDR were assessed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, HbA1c, and diabetes duration. Discrimination was evaluated with ROC curves/AUC (95% CI) and DeLong comparisons of AUCs. ResultsDR was present in 63% of eyes. DR was associated with lower VD (central, inner, outer, full) and lower PD (central, inner, full) (all p[≤]0.04). After adjustment, central VD (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.98) and central PD (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.99) remained independently associated with DR. The OCT-A model outperformed the clinical model (AUC 0.73 vs 0.60); the combined model yielded AUC 0.76. ConclusionVD and PD from the superficial plexus are independently associated with DR and show superior discrimination versus conventional clinical factors alone, supporting OCT-A as an adjunct for earlier DR detection.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.