Back

Latent Class Analysis Identifies Pulmonary Function Trajectory Phenotypes in Lung Transplant Recipients with Chronic Allograft Dysfunction

Neely, M.; Wojdyla, D. M.; Hong, H.; Wang, P.; Anderson, M. R.; Arroyo, K.; Belperio, J.; Benvenuto, L.; Budev, M.; Combs, M.; Dhillon, G.; Hsu, J. Y.; Kalman, L.; Martinu, T.; McDyer, J.; Oyster, M.; Pandya, K.; Reynolds, J. M.; Rim, J. G.; Roe, D. W.; Shah, P. D.; Singer, J. P.; Singer, L.; Snyder, L. P.; Tsuang, W.; Weigt, S. S.; Christie, J. D.; Palmer, S. M.; Todd, J.

2026-04-23 transplantation
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351501 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: We aimed to identify data-driven FEV1 trajectory phenotypes post-chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), relate these phenotypes to patient factors and future graft loss, and develop a classification approach for prospective patients. Methods: We studied adult first lung recipients with probable CLAD from two prospective multicenter cohorts: CTOT-20 (n=206) and LTOG (n=1418). FEV1 trajectories over the first nine months post-CLAD were characterized using joint latent class mixed models, jointly modelling time-to-graft loss to account for informative censoring. Models were fit independently in both cohorts and also only among LTOG bilateral recipients. A classification and regression tree (CART) model was derived in LTOG bilateral recipients and applied to CTOT-20 bilateral recipients. Findings: Four distinct early FEV1 trajectory classes were identified in CTOT-20, with large differences in nine month graft loss (72.3%, 31.1%, 2.2%, 0%). In LTOG, similar trajectory patterns were reproduced, with an additional class demonstrating early post-CLAD FEV1 improvement. Among bilateral recipients, trajectory classes showed a clear risk gradient, including a high-risk class with 100% graft loss and a low-risk class with no early graft loss. A CART model incorporating clinical and spirometric variables demonstrated good discrimination in LTOG bilateral recipients (multiclass AUC 0.85) and consistent class assignment and trajectory patterns when applied to CTOT-20. Interpretation: We identified reproducible, clinically meaningful early post-CLAD FEV1 trajectory phenotypes with differential graft loss risk. These phenotypes and a pragmatic classification tool may support risk stratification, trial enrichment, and improved prognostication for patients and clinicians.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
5
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
8
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.4%
12
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
18
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
22
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%