Latent Class Analysis Identifies Pulmonary Function Trajectory Phenotypes in Lung Transplant Recipients with Chronic Allograft Dysfunction
Neely, M.; Wojdyla, D. M.; Hong, H.; Wang, P.; Anderson, M. R.; Arroyo, K.; Belperio, J.; Benvenuto, L.; Budev, M.; Combs, M.; Dhillon, G.; Hsu, J. Y.; Kalman, L.; Martinu, T.; McDyer, J.; Oyster, M.; Pandya, K.; Reynolds, J. M.; Rim, J. G.; Roe, D. W.; Shah, P. D.; Singer, J. P.; Singer, L.; Snyder, L. P.; Tsuang, W.; Weigt, S. S.; Christie, J. D.; Palmer, S. M.; Todd, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundWe aimed to identify data-driven FEV1 trajectory phenotypes post-chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), relate these phenotypes to patient factors and future graft loss, and develop a classification approach for prospective patients. MethodsWe studied adult first lung recipients with probable CLAD from two prospective multicenter cohorts: CTOT-20 (n=206) and LTOG (n=1418). FEV1 trajectories over the first nine months post-CLAD were characterized using joint latent class mixed models, jointly modelling time-to-graft loss to account for informative censoring. Models were fit independently in both cohorts and also only among LTOG bilateral recipients. A classification and regression tree (CART) model was derived in LTOG bilateral recipients and applied to CTOT-20 bilateral recipients. FindingsFour distinct early FEV1 trajectory classes were identified in CTOT-20, with large differences in nine-month graft loss (72{middle dot}3%, 31{middle dot}1%, 2{middle dot}2%, 0%). In LTOG, similar trajectory patterns were reproduced, with an additional class demonstrating early post-CLAD FEV1 improvement. Among bilateral recipients, trajectory classes showed a clear risk gradient, including a high-risk class with 100% graft loss and a low-risk class with no early graft loss. A CART model incorporating clinical and spirometric variables demonstrated good discrimination in LTOG bilateral recipients (multiclass AUC 0{middle dot}85) and consistent class assignment and trajectory patterns when applied to CTOT-20. InterpretationWe identified reproducible, clinically meaningful early post-CLAD FEV1 trajectory phenotypes with differential graft loss risk. These phenotypes and a pragmatic classification tool may support risk stratification, trial enrichment, and improved prognostication for patients and clinicians. FundingNational Institutes of Health, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of de novo Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation 94%
- Predicting Post-Liver Transplant Outcomes in Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure using Expert-Augmented Machine Learning 92%
- Balancing Equity and HLA Matching in Deceased-Donor Kidney Allocation with Eplet Mismatch 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- CT-based Machine Learning for Donor Lung Screening Prior to Transplantation 95%
- Genome-wide association study reveals two novel genetic loci associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction 93%
- Relationship Between Donor Derived Cell-Free DNA and Tissue-Based Rejection-Related Transcripts In Heart Transplantation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antibody response and breakthrough infection in dialysis 86%
- Antibody response to a fourth mRNA Covid-19 vaccine boost in weak responder kidney transplant recipients 85%
- Clinical and Virological Response to a Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody for Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbiota Predict Infections and Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 89%
- Microbiome data enhances predictive models of lung function in people with cystic fibrosis 88%
- A unique dexamethasone-dependent gene expression profile in the lungs of COVID-19 patients 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.