Back

Assessing Parent-cocreated Sensory Reactivity Outcomes in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders Undergoing Bumetanide Treatment: A Multiple-Baseline Single-Case Experimental Design

Geertjens, L. L. M. G.; Cristian, G.; Ramautar, J. J. R.; Haverman, L.; Schalet, B. B. D.; Linkenkaer-Hansen, K.; van der Wilt, G.-J.; Sprengers, J. J. J.; Bruining, H.

2026-04-23 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351464 medRxiv
Show abstract

Progress in pharmacological treatment development for neurodevelopmental disorders is hindered by a misalignment between targeted mechanisms, outcome measures, and trial designs. This study was initiated as a post-trial access pathway for bumetanide and later expanded with treatment-naive participants. Within this framework, we implemented a parent-cocreated sensory outcome measure set (PROMset) in an unmasked, multiple-baseline single-case experimental design with randomized baseline periods of 2-12 weeks, followed by 6 months of bumetanide treatment (up to 1.5 mg twice daily). Participants (7-19 years) had atypical sensory reactivity and a diagnosis of ASD, ADHD, epilepsy, or TSC. The primary outcome was a PROMset comprising seven PROMIS item banks assessing anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, fatigue, sleep-related impairment, cognitive function, and peer relationships. Secondary outcomes included SSP, SRS-2, RBS-R, and ABC. Of 113 enrolled participants (mean age 13.2 [SD 2.7], 64% male), 102 completed the trial and 95 had analyzable PROMsets. At baseline, PROMset scores showed substantial impairment across domains (mean deviation =9.0 T-score points, p<.001) and correlated with sensory reactivity (SSP; r=-0.40, p<.001). Individual-level analyses showed improvement in 24-41% of participants per PROM domain, most frequently in anxiety and depressive symptoms (41% and 38%; mean across-case Cohen's d=-1). Overall, 83% improved on at least one domain. Group-level analyses showed improvement across all secondary outcomes (p<.001), with superiority over historic placebo for RBS-R and SSP. Integrating PROMsets with individualized trial designs can reveal clinically meaningful changes, supporting a more sensitive and patient-centered framework for treatment evaluation in heterogeneous populations.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
2
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
4
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.3%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
9
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
21
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
23
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
24
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
25
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
27
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
28
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%