Back

Accessible and Reproducible Renal Cell Carcinoma Research Through Open-Sourcing Data and Annotations

de Boer, S.; Häntze, H.; Ziegelmayer, S.; van Ginneken, B.; Prokop, M.; Bressem, K. K.; Hering, A.

2026-04-23 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351451 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMedical imaging, especially computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, is essential in clinical care of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Artificial intelligence (AI) research into computer-aided diagnosis, staging and treatment planning needs curated and annotated datasets. Across literature, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets are widely used for model training and validation. However, re-annotation is often necessary due to limited access to public annotations, raising entry barriers and hindering comparison with prior work. MethodsWe screened 1915 CT scans from three TCGA-RCC databases and employed a segmentation model to annotate kidney lesion. After a meta-data-based exclusion step, we hosted a reader study with all papillary (n=56), chromophobe (n=27) and 200 randomly selected clear cell RCC cases. Two students quality checked and corrected the data as well as annotated tumors and cysts. Uncertain cases were checked by a board-certified radiologist. ResultsAfter data exclusion and quality control a total of 142 annotated CT scans from 101 patients (26 female, 75 male, mean age 56 years) remained. This includes 95 CTs with clear cell RCC, 29 with papillary RCC and 18 with chromophobe RCC. Images and voxel-level annotations of kidneys and lesions are open sourced at https://zenodo.org/records/19630298. ConclusionBy making the annotations open-source, we encourage accessible and reproducible AI research for renal cell carcinoma. We invite other researchers who have previously annotated any of these cohorts to share their annotations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.