Back

DIVAID: Consistent division of atrial geometries from multimodal imaging according to the EHRA/EACVI 15-segment bi-atrial model

Goetz, C.; Eichenlaub, M.; Schmidt, K.; Wiedmann, F.; Invers Rubio, E.; Martinez Diaz, P.; Luik, A.; Althoff, T.; Schmidt, C.; Loewe, A.

2026-04-23 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351448 medRxiv
Show abstract

The recently published EHRA/EACVI consensus statement on a standardized bi-atrial regionalization provides new opportunities for consistent regional analyses across patients, imaging modalities and clinical centers. To make this standardized regionalization widely accessible, we developed the open-source software DIVAID, which automatically divides bi-atrial geometries according to the proposed regions, ensuring consistency, reproducibility and operator independence. We evaluated the accuracy of the algorithm by comparing its results to manual expert annotations across 140 geometries from multiple modalities and centers. Veins were automatically clipped correctly in 81% and orifices annotated correctly in 100% of cases. The median (interquartile range; IQR) Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for left atrial regions was 0.98 (0.96-1.00) for DIVAID-expert and 0.98 (0.94-1.00) for inter-expert comparisons. For right atrial geometries, DSC was higher for DIVAID-expert than for inter-expert comparisons at 0.90 (0.80-0.95) and 0.88 (0.74-0.94), respectively. To assess the accuracy of regional boundaries, we computed the mean average surface distance (MASD) for boundaries derived from automatic or manual annotations. The median (IQR) MASD between DIVAID and experts was 0.17 mm (0.03-0.78) and 1.93 mm (0.65-3.96) in the left and right atrium, respectively. To conclude, DIVAID robustly divides anatomically diverse bi-atrial geometries according to the 15-segment model, while outperforming cardiac experts in both speed and consistency, and demonstrating an accuracy of regional boundaries comparable to the spatial resolution of cardiac imaging modalities. By providing automated, consistent atrial regionalization, DIVAID enables large-scale, standardized regional analyses and data-driven investigation of harmonized, multi-dimensional datasets, which may advance atrial arrhythmia research and personalized treatment strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
5
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
7
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
14
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%
27
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%