Back

Robustly Quantifying Uncertainty in International Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Infection Fatality Ratios

Gada, L.; Afuleni, M. K.; Noble, M.; House, T.; Finnie, T.

2026-04-23 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351373 medRxiv
Show abstract

Knowing the mortality rates associated with infection by a pathogen is essential for effective preparedness and response. Here, harnessing the flexibility of a Bayesian approach, we produce an estimate of the Infection Fatality Ratio (IFR) for A(H5N1) conditional on explicit assumptions, and quantify the uncertainty thereof. We also apply the method to first-wave COVID-19 data up to March 2020, demonstrating the estimates that could be obtained were the model available then. Our analysis uses World Development Indicators (WDI) from the World Bank, the A(H5N1) WHO confirmed cases and deaths tracker by country (2003-2024), and COVID-19 cases and deaths data from John Hopkins University (January and February 2020). Since infectious disease dynamics are typically influenced by local socio-economic factors rather than political borders, individual countries are placed within clusters of countries sharing similar WDIs relevant to respiratory viral diseases, with clusters derived by performing Hierarchical Clustering. To estimate the IFR, we fit a Negative Binomial Bayesian Hierarchical Model for A(H5N1) and COVID-19 separately. We explicitly modelled key unobserved parameters with informative priors from expert opinion and literature. By modelling underreporting, our analysis suggests lower fatality (15.3%) compared to WHOs Case Fatality Ratio estimate (54%) on lab-confirmed cases. However, credible intervals are wide ([0.5%, 64.2%] 95% CrI). Therefore, good preparedness for a potential A(H5N1) pandemic implies adopting scenario planning under our central estimate, as well as for IFRs as high as 70%. Our approach also returns a COVID-19 IFR estimate of 2.8% with [2.5%, 3.1%] 95% CrI which is consistent with literature. Key MessagesO_LIWe adopted a disease-agnostic and adaptable Bayesian model, embedding scientific knowledge on A(H5N1) in the priors informed by published literature, to estimate the Infection Fatality Ratio (IFR) of avian influenza A(H5N1). C_LIO_LIAccounting for underreporting of cases and deaths, we estimate the IFR of avian influenza A(H5N1) at 15.3%, albeit with wide uncertainty ([0.5%, 64.2%] 95% Credible Intervals). C_LIO_LIDue to the uncertainty in the estimate, good preparedness for a potential A(H5N1) pandemic implies adopting scenario planning under our central estimate, as well as for IFRs as high as 70%. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.7%
2
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
4
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
7
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.9%
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
18
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
24
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.0%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
27
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
28
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
30
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%