Back

Cartilage canals in sharks and rays show that blood vessels can exist in mature cartilage without triggering endochondral bone formation

Flaum, B.; Seidel, R.; Yeatman-Biggs, M.; Hinrichs, T. I.; Ciecierska-Holmes, J.; Matan, S. O.; Gualda, E. J.; Lyons, K.; Camilieri-Asch, V.; McGlashan, S. R.; Ekstrom, L.; Bonassar, L.; Debiais-thibaud, M.; Baum, D.; Blumer, M. J.; Dean, M. N.

2026-04-23 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.21.720020 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although cartilage in tetrapod skeletons is typically said to lack blood vessels, this is only true for adult cartilage. In young bird and mammal cartilage, a dense network of vasculature-containing tunnels --cartilage canals-- perforate the growing skeleton, helping nourish the cartilage and develop the ossification centers that will later form the skeletons epiphyseal bone. As the canals and their rich vascular network typically recede as animals age, the healthy cartilage of adult animals is typically known to be avascular. Here, however, we use a range of tissue characterization and visualization techniques --including light/electron microscopy and microCT-- to show that the skeletons of rays and sharks (elasmobranch fishes) not only possess cartilage canals, but that these structures persist in the adult skeleton. The morphology and tissue composition of elasmobranch cartilage canals argues homology with mammalian cartilage canals and an ancient invasion of the vascular system into cartilage. However, the anatomical location of canals --extending away from mineralized tissue not toward it-- and the lack of endochondral ossification in ray and shark cartilage suggest that cartilage canals developed early in vertebrates as a transport system for nutrients and mesenchymal cells into the growing skeleton. We describe distinctive features and variation in elasmobranch cartilage canals, discuss their possible roles and their potential for tissue mineralization, and the biomedical implications for their presence in a clade of animals with continuously growing cartilaginous skeletons.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
17.4%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.1%
3
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
9
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
13
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
16
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
19
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
21
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
22
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%