Back

Transcriptional regulators predicted to drive macrophage dysregulation during impaired wound healing in diabetic mice

Lukas, B. E.; Pang, J.; Dai, Y.; Koh, T. J.

2026-04-24 immunology
10.64898/2026.04.21.719960 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dysregulation of Mo/M{varphi} activity is known to contribute to impaired healing in diabetes; however, the mechanisms underlying this dysregulation are not well understood. In this study, we used a variety of bioinformatics approaches along with our time series scRNA-seq data on wound Mo/M{varphi} from non-diabetic and diabetic mice to identify transcriptional regulators (TRs) that drive Mo/M{varphi} state transitions during normal and impaired healing. First, we used the Lamian framework and our newly developed Pseudotime Graph Diffusion method to show that state transitions from early stage phenotypes to later stage reparative and antigen presenting phenotypes characteristic of normally healing wounds are impaired and that transitions to inflammatory, foam cell-like, and Lyve-1+ M{varphi} phenotypes are enhanced during impaired healing of diabetic mice. Using our BITFAM model, we identified a broad range of TRs predicted to be preferentially active in each cell state and using CellOracle, we performed in silico perturbation to identify groups of TRs predicted to drive cell state transitions along multiple trajectories (e.g. CEBPA, IRF8), whereas other TRs were predicted to drive cell state transition towards reparative phenotypes (e.g. NR1H3, NR3C1) or towards an antigen-presenting phenotype (e.g. IRF4, OGT). Selected findings were validated using existing experimental data, confirming the usefulness of this approach. In conclusion, we identified TRs that likely drive Mo/M{varphi} state transitions towards desirable and undesirable phenotypes for wound healing. These findings provide insight into novel targets for altering Mo/M{varphi} phenotypes to promote healing of diabetic wounds.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.6%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
6
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
8
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
15
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
23
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Glycobiology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%