Back

From Big Bang to Biochemistry: Entropy-Oriented Mechanics and Information Force Fields as a Unifying Framework for the Origin of Carbon-Based Life

Truong, Q. H. X.; Truong, X. K.

2026-04-24 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.21.719958 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of amino acids (AAs) and nucleobases (NBs) across meteorites, interstellar ices, and laboratory shock experiments presents a paradox: why do these specific molecular motifs--a minuscule subset of organic chemistrys combinatorial space--appear repeatedly across diverse environments, in the absence of biological selection? We identify a physical mechanism, prebiotic selection, which biases driven chemical systems toward configurations with high stationary probability p*(x) under sustained entropy flux. The bias is quantified by an information quasi-potential {Phi}I (x) = - ln p*(x), entering the overdamped Langevin dynamics O_FD O_INLINEFIG[Formula 1]C_INLINEFIGM_FD(1)C_FD where {Sigma} is the local entropy production rate (Schnakenberg 1976). {Phi}I is defined self-consistently via the full non-equilibrium stationary density, avoiding the circularity of identifying it with a scalar potential. Two central theorems underlie the framework. Theorem 1 establishes that {nabla}{Sigma} and {nabla}{Phi}I are generically linearly independent off equilibrium, so the dynamics is genuinely two-field. Theorem 2 (structural constraints on single-field gradient dynamics) shows that single-field models on compact manifolds (i) produce yield curves that are at most unimodal under linear driving, and (ii) combine disjoint perturbations additively, giving superlinearity factor S = 1 + O(||{delta} V ||2). The observed superlinear synergy of Ferris et al. (1996) lies far outside this perturbative bound and therefore requires the two-field structure of EOM-IFF; the non-monotonic peak of Blank et al. (2001) is consistent with two-field dynamics and also with single-field dynamics in the unimodal-with-peak case of Theorem 2 part 1, so it does not by itself discriminate. From these results, we: (i) define a formal substrate-minimal criterion for prebiotic selection; (ii) show consistency with the non-monotonic shock-synthesis yield of Blank et al. (2001) (R2 = 0.885, peak at P* = 28.4 {+/-} 1.4 GPa); (iii) show consistency with the superlinear clay-catalysed RNA polymerisation of Ferris et al. (1996) (synergy factor S {approx} 5.75, robust under {+/-}1-nucleotide measurement uncertainty); and (iv) state two further falsifiable predictions awaiting dedicated experimental tests. Every lemma and theorem is accompanied by explicit assumptions, regime of validity, and regime of failure; the frameworks scope is what it claims, not more. Prebiotic selection is identified as a physical process distinct from and prior to biological selection, offering a unified account of chemical convergence in carbon-nitrogen chemistry under sustained entropy flux.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.4%
4
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.1%
7
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
10
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
16
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
19
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%