Back

Revisiting the genome assembly of Lupinus species reveals differential diploidization after a shared whole-genome duplication

Yang, L.; Shuai, Y.; Li, W.; Gao, J.; Zhang, J.; Lyu, H.; Ji, S.; Chen, M.

2026-04-23 genomics
10.64898/2026.04.21.719918 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate genome assemblies are essential for comparative genomics, yet Hi-C-guided scaffolding can introduce structural errors that misrepresent chromosome architecture and bias evolutionary inferences. Here, we identified pervasive scaffolding errors - including artificial fusions, internal inversions, and incomplete contig mounting - in two previously published Lupinus genomes (L. cosentinii and L. digitatus) using a segmentation method based on LTR retrotransposon density. We re-assembled both genomes, producing chromosome-level references of 472.7 Mb (16 chromosomes) and 427.2 Mb (21 chromosomes), with BUSCO completeness >98.5%. Synteny validation and re-application of LTR profiling confirmed that all prior errors were resolved. Using these corrected genomes together with four additional Lupinus species and two outgroup legumes, we investigated post-polyploid evolution. Synonymous substitution rate (Ks) analysis revealed a genus-specific whole-genome duplication (WGD) event (Ks = 0.17) shared by all six Lupinus species. The proportion of WGD-derived genes varied markedly, from 60% in L. digitatus to only 36% in L. mutabilis, indicating differential diploidization. While all species retained a core set of WGD duplicates enriched in cytoskeleton organization, ion transport, and defense responses, each exhibited lineage-specific functional trajectories: cell wall modification in L. cosentinii and L. digitatus, nitrogen metabolism in L. albus and L. angustifolius, flower development in L. luteus, and stress/lipid metabolism in L. mutabilis. Our corrected assemblies provide optimal references for Lupinus comparative genomics, and our findings demonstrate that a shared WGD event can lead to both conserved and highly divergent post-polyploid fates, likely underpinning adaptive diversification within the genus.

Published in G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.