Back

Landscape-scale navigation unlocks antibody CDR structural logic for AI-guided rescue and therapeutic optimization

Chun, C.; Sohn, B.-K.; Ki, H.; Jo, J. H.; An, H.-T.; Park, J.; Lee, J.; Choi, S.; Choi, J.; Cho, H.; Lee, S. B.; Yu, B.; Lee, C. Y.; Kim, J. E.; Ban, Y.-j.; Choi, Y.-Y.; Choi, B.; Lee, H.; Chung, J.; Baek, M.; Yoon, T.-Y.

2026-04-23 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.21.719857 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While AI offers transformative potential for therapeutic antibody design, the lack of ground-truth data fundamentally constrains our ability to model the epistatic topology of fitness landscapes. Here, we establish a high-throughput workflow to characterize tens of thousands of antibody variants per week with gold-standard biophysical precision. By combinatorially assembling functional variants from deep mutational scanning, we charted antibody fitness landscapes comprising over 17,000 data points, which revealed an extremely rugged, non-navigable epistatic topology. Yet, navigating at this unprecedented scale enabled the discovery of rare peak clusters exhibiting simultaneous enhancements in affinity and productivity. Strikingly, ProteinMPNN predicted the CDR-dependent productivity landscape with remarkable accuracy, suggesting that sequence-structure compatibility within CDRs gates cellular productivity. This insight enabled a structure-guided rescue strategy combining AlphaFold3 and ProteinMPNN, which successfully restored the cellular productivity of high-affinity, low-productivity clones via single amino acid substitutions. Two elite variants drawn directly from peak clusters further demonstrated 20- to 100-fold in vivo efficacy gains in a murine psoriasis model. Our findings establish CDR structural fitness as a fundamental determinant of antibody cellular productivity and validate landscape-scale navigation as a powerful framework for therapeutic antibody optimization.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.