Back

Longitudinal serum proteomics analyses reveal biomarkers for porcine influenza and coronavirus infections

Frampas, C.; Paudyal, B.; Guo, J.; van Reeth, K.; Whetton, A. D.; Subbannayya, Y.; Tchilian, E.; Pinto, S. M.

2026-04-23 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.04.21.719833 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Respiratory virus infections affect both humans and livestock, causing considerable mortality and morbidity. While respiratory pathogens such as swine influenza A virus (pH1N1) and porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV) often present with overlapping clinical symptoms, their pathological trajectories and outcomes differ. Given the propensity for pathogen spillover and the use of pigs as a physiologically relevant large-animal translational model, we aimed to characterise host serum protein signatures that detect and differentiate pH1N1 from PRCV, enabling improved disease monitoring and control. Using high-resolution mass spectrometry- based proteomics, we identified 162 serum proteins that were significantly dysregulated across 3 infection timepoints (1, 5, and 12 days post-infection (DPI)), with signatures correlating with viral shedding and lung pathology as early as 1 DPI. Notably, multiplexed targeted analysis of a subset of proteins in an independent cohort from a different breed and geographic location demonstrated detection, femtomole-level targeted quantitation, and validation of SRGN as a diagnostic marker for pH1N1 and PRCV (AUC=0.85). Further, SOD1 was validated as an early marker for PRCV, increasing as early as 1 DPI (AUC= 0.9). Finally, a multi-peptide signature composed of SRGN, SOD1, and RAN demonstrated reasonable predictive power for pH1N1 (AUC=0.75) and PRCV (AUC=0.65) at 1 DPI. Our data validate the proteomic screening, provide insights into the role of early protein markers in distinguishing respiratory viral infections, and pave the way for the development of point-of-care diagnostics and targeted prevention strategies, enhancing preparedness against emerging zoonotic threats.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
18.7%
2
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
3
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
5
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
10
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
17
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
19
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
24
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
26
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
28
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%
30
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%