Back

AutoNeuro: An Open-Source fMRI Toolbox for Real-Time Neuroadaptive Task Design

Haydock, D.; Sherwood, O.; Razin, R.; Dick, F.; Leech, R.

2026-04-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.21.719824 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) offers a powerful means of studying brain function adaptively, enabling experimental parameters to be updated dynamically in response to ongoing neural activity. However, current approaches remain limited by complex infrastructure requirements, bespoke implementations, and a lack of flexible frameworks for closed-loop neuroimaging, with many primarily focusing on neurofeedback experimental designs. Here we present AutoNeuro, an open-source framework for real-time fMRI acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, and adaptive experimental control. AutoNeuro connects directly to the MRI scanner, receiving reconstructed slices as soon as they become available, and streams them into a modular analysis pipeline designed for low-latency processing. Neural features are estimated at the temporal resolution of acquisition and are passed to a Bayesian optimisation agent that selects task conditions to maximise a user-defined objective function. Experimental conditions are represented within a bounded "experiment space", allowing heterogeneous conditions to be explored within a common coordinate system. We demonstrate AutoNeuro in a real-time fMRI experiment in which the system adaptively sampled task conditions to obtain a continuous map of brain response to the range of conditions contained within the experimental space. The system operated within the temporal constraints of real-time preprocessing and analysis, maintaining stable model estimates across iterations, converging on experimental conditions most relevant to the measured brain metric. These results establish AutoNeuro as a flexible platform for closed-loop neuroimaging, supporting hypothesis-driven optimisation as well as exploratory mapping of brain metrics across large experimental spaces.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
18.6%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.2%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
24
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%