Back

Towards Scaling-Up Three-Dimensional Habitat Structural Measurements with Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing

Suter, S.; Ah-Peng, C.; Kabache, S.; Seidel, D.; Strasberg, D.; Zemp, D. C.

2026-04-23 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.21.719810 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) captures fine-scaled three-dimensional measurements of ecosystem structure, supporting monitoring of the Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs). Yet employing TLS across landscapes remains challenging in remote and topographically complex areas. Remote sensing provides a potential pathway for upscaling TLS-derived structural metrics, but to what extent is unquantified particularly in heterogenous environments, like oceanic islands. Here, we investigated the ability of remote sensing to estimate TLS-derived habitat structure across three contrasting habitats (lowland rainforest, montane cloud forest, and subalpine summit scrub) on La Reunion island. Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Aerial LiDAR (ALS) data were acquired over plots where TLS was completed. We derived defined indices of backscatter coefficients, vegetation indices, and LiDAR metrics and assessed their alignment with TLS measurements using a Procrustes analysis. Subsequently, we used General Additive Models to estimate TLS habitat structure from remote sensing variables. Sentinel-2 exhibited the highest multivariate alignment with TLS (r = 0.51). TLS measurements of horizontal and vertical structure were estimated with the highest cross-validated predictive accuracy (R2 0.39 - 0.73), whilst structural complexity metrics were estimated with greater difficulty (R2 0.02 - 0.20). Multi-sensor models outperformed all single-sensor models in prediction estimates. Model performance also varied across habitats, with the highest agreement between predicted and observed values in the lowland rainforest (r = 0.38), and the lowest agreement (r = 0.35) in the montane cloud forest. Yet the dominant structural feature of each habitat was most accurately captured with remote sensing. Our results demonstrate the potential of integrating multi-sensor remote sensing data to upscale key dimensions of TLS-derived ecosystem structure but remains challenging for fine-scale structural complexity. These findings highlight both the potential and constraints of remote sensing for developing scalable, long-term monitoring frameworks for EBVs, especially in structurally complex and underrepresented island ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
3
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
8
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.4%
12
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
19
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
22
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
30
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%