Back

Bidirectional coupling among EMT, AXL-RB1 signaling and lineage switch drives resistance to osimertinib and worse clinical outcomes in NSCLC

Vashistha, S.; Meena, R. K.; Kulkarni, P.; Salgia, R.; Jolly, M. K.

2026-04-24 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.21.719547 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acquired resistance to osimertinib remains a major barrier in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and in many patients cannot be explained by secondary targetable mutations. This pattern highlights a central role for non-genetic plasticity programs, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), drug tolerance, immune evasion, and lineage switch. Here, we used a systems-level framework to define how these processes are coordinated. We constructed a minimal gene regulatory network integrating core EMT regulators with AXL, RB1, PD-L1, and NF-{kappa}B, and analysed its emergent behaviour using dynamical simulations. The network resolved into two mutually inhibitory, self-reinforcing "teams": an epithelial/sensitive team centred on RB1, miR-200, miR-34, p53, and E-cadherin, and a mesenchymal/resistant team centred on ZEB1, SNAIL, AXL, PD-L1, and NF-{kappa}B. Simulations predicted a strong coupling between EMT and osimertinib resistance, which was validated across bulk transcriptomic datasets from NSCLC cell lines, EGFR-mutant patient cohorts, and perturbation experiments. Inducing EMT increased RB1-loss programs, whereas osimertinib exposure induced AXL and EMT programs, supporting bidirectional regulation and reinforcement. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses further showed that EMT, AXL, PD-L1 activity, and reduced RB1 signaling co-occur within tumors. Clinically, activation of individual axes such as EMT, RB1 loss, or PD-L1 upregulation was associated with worse outcomes, while combined activation produced markedly poorer survival than any single axis alone. Extending the network to incorporate lineage regulators further linked a partial LUAD-to-LUSC shift with EMT, RB1 loss, and resistance. Together, these findings identify a network topology that coordinates multiple plasticity programs driving osimertinib resistance and suggest that disrupting this cooperative architecture may offer a therapeutic strategy in EGFR-mutant LUAD.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
2
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.8%
4
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 7%
5.5%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.8%
7
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.2%
10
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
13
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
17
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
NAR Cancer
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
27
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Journal of Biological Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Integrative Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%