Back

Development of species-specific real-time PCR assays for the identification of five European Rhinolophus bats.

Wright, P.; Palacios, M. B.; Hargreaves, D.; Kitching, T.; Bücs, S.-L.; Budinski, I.; Bajic, B.; Jere, C.; Csösz, I.; Harry, I. C.; Etheridge, T.; Mathews, F.

2026-04-23 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.21.719147 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The detection and monitoring of bat species using non-invasive sampling and molecular techniques has become increasingly popular in recent years. In Europe, these approaches have been applied to identify horseshoe bats of the genus Rhinolophus, which includes five species: R. hipposideros, R. ferrumequinum, R. euryale, R. mehelyi and R. blasii. While species-specific real-time PCR assays exist for R. ferrumequinum and R. hipposideros, no unified panel of real-time PCR assays currently enables the identification of all five European Rhinolophus species from non-invasively collected samples. Here, we developed five species-specific real-time PCR assays, each targeting interspecies nucleotide variation within the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. To enhance single-base discrimination, RNase H-dependent PCR (rhPCR) primers were employed, incorporating cleavable blocked primers that require perfect complementarity for extension. The assays were applied to droppings non-invasively collected from 18 caves and one church in Serbia and Romania. Of the 149 samples analysed, 131 (88%) yielded successful amplification of Rhinolophus DNA. Detection probabilities for the three species identified in the field ranged from 0.49 to 0.82. Occupancy estimates varied, with R. euryale showing the highest (0.86; UI: 0.69-0.97) and R. mehelyi the lowest (0.23; UI: 0.08-0.43). The assays were capable of detecting up to three species concurrently within a single pooled sample (approximately 15 droppings). These assays are especially valuable for detecting R. mehelyi, given its rarity and uncertain distribution, and offer a robust tool for monitoring Rhinolophus populations across Europe.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
5
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
6
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
9
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
10
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
14
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%