Palaeorobotics Uncovers Devastating Mammalian Tail Strike Dynamics
Le Verger, K.; Allione, F.; Wang, B.; Weisse, B.; Ijspeert, A.; Sanchez-Villagra, M. R.; Scheyer, T. M.; Jusufi, A.
Show abstract
Extant animals occupy only a fraction of evolutionary design space, leaving many extinct morphologies without living analogues for functional testing. We combined comparative anatomy of 32 glyptodont species with a life-sized palaeorobotic tail rig to determine strike severity in club-tailed giant from the Pleistocene megafauna Doedicurus. The robophysical model, informed by fossil geometry and inertia, matched simulated fossil-tail collision momentum (98-105%) and generated peak forces of 81.1 kN at 6.4 m{middle dot}s-{superscript 1}, with an impulse of 427 N{middle dot}s, far exceeding equine extremity fracture forces. Peak force scaled near-linearly with strike velocity, implying [~]183 kN at projected top speed of 15 m{middle dot}s-{superscript 1}. Measurements suggest Doedicurus delivered high-severity strikes, supporting antipredator defence as primary selective driver of extreme tail weaponization, and establish palaeorobotic validation of extinct animal biomechanics.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Parallel Sensory Compensation following Independent Subterranean Colonization by Groundwater Salamanders (Eurycea ) 95%
- Low effective mechanical advantage of giraffes' limbs during walking reveals trade-off between limb length and locomotor performance 95%
- Tube feet dynamics drive adaptation in sea star locomotion 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relict duck-billed dinosaurs survived into the last age of the dinosaurs in subantarctic Chile 96%
- Muscle-controlled physics simulations of the emu (a large running bird) resolve the grounded running paradox 94%
- Impact of Holocene environmental change on the evolutionary ecology of an Arctic top predator 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.