Back

Demystifying Clone-Censor-Weight Method in Target Trial Emulation: A Real-World Study of HPV Vaccination Strategies

Lin, T.; Li, Y.; Huang, Z.; Gui, T. T.; Wang, W.; Guo, Y.

2026-04-22 health informatics
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351413 medRxiv
Show abstract

Target trial emulation (TTE) offers a principled way to estimate treatment effects using real-world observational data, but analyses of time-varying treatment strategies remain vulnerable to immortal time bias. The clone-censor-weight (CCW) approach is increasingly used to address this problem, yet key aspects of its causal interpretation and implementation remain unclear. In this work, we emulate a target trial using electronic health records (EHRs) to compare completion of a 3-dose 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccination (HPV) series within 12 months versus remaining partially vaccinated among vaccine initiators. We link CCW to the classic potential outcome framework in causal inference, evaluate the role of different weighting mechanisms, and account for within-subject correlation induced by cloning using cluster-robust variance estimation. Our study provides practical guidance for applying CCW in real-world comparative effectiveness studies to address immortal time bias and supports more rigorous and interpretable treatment effect estimation in TTE.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Trials
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.8%
4
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
9
Epidemiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Research Synthesis Methods
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
21
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
22
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%