Back

Integrating α-Synuclein Seeding Activity (SAA) into routine practice: insights from the multicenter ALZAN Cohort

Jourdan, O.; Duchiron, M.; Torrent, J.; Turpinat, C.; Mondesert, E.; Busto, G.; Morchikh, M.; Dornadic, M.; Delaby, C.; Hirtz, C.; Thizy, L.; Barnier-Figue, G.; Perrein, F.; Jurici, S.; Gabelle, A.; Bennys, K.; Lehmann, S.

2026-04-23 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351389 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the -synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) and characterize the impact of -synuclein co-pathology on cognitive and biological profiles in routine clinical practice. Methods: We included 398 patients from the prospective multicenter ALZAN cohort recruited from memory clinics in Montpellier, Nimes, and Perpignan. All participants underwent CSF and blood sampling with measurement of CSF biomarkers (A{beta}42/40, tau, ptau181) and plasma biomarkers (A{beta}42/40, ptau181, ptau217, GFAP, NfL). Cognitive assessment was performed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Clinical diagnoses were independently confirmed by two senior neurologists. Syn status was determined by SAA (RT-QuIC). Results: Of 398 patients, 19 out of 20 patients with Lewy body dementia (LBD) (95.0%) and 32 out of 203 patients with AD (15.8%) were SAA+. SAA-positivity presented a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 93.5% for distinguishing LBD from patients without LBD or AD. In the entire cohort, SAA+ patients showed lower MMSE scores (p<0.01), lower CSF A{beta}42/40 ratio (p<0.01), and elevated plasma GFAP (p<0.05). Within the AD group, no significant differences in CSF or blood biomarkers were observed between SAA+ and SAA- patients. Within the AD subgroup, no significant differences in CSF or blood biomarkers were observed between SAA+ and SAA- patients, except for a lower CSF A{beta}42/40 ratio in SAA+ patients (p<0.01). Interpretation: SAA demonstrates good diagnostic capabilities for detecting LBD and confirms notable Syn co-pathology in AD. This study highlights the limitations of routine CSF and emerging blood biomarkers in capturing Syn pathology and the value of integrating SAA into routine neurodegenerative disease assessment.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
32.7%
2
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
3
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
4
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
8
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
10
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
17
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
19
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
23
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%